When HandBrake was running at full speed, the iMac Pro sounded pretty much the same-but the air coming out of the vents on the back was definitely warmer! In my normal office environment, I can't hear it-only when I spun the iMac Pro around and listened with all other devices off could I hear it, faintly blowing. So far as I can tell, the iMac Pro's fan may always be running, but it's amazingly quiet. When running HandBrake, the fan on my 5K iMac would always crank up and was quite audible when it did so. I was thinking about this, wondering if I should return the 2017 iMac when I read Jason Snell's first impressions of his entry-level iMac Pro: As noted by iFixit, the 27-inch Retina iMac is cooled by one, solitary fan mounted in the middle of the case: This should not have been surprising, probably. I've heard very mixed things about this from people on Twitter and friends with 2017 iMacs, so I can't say this is a universal truth, but the Core i7-powered iMac on my desk seemed to ramp up its fan far more often than my older i5, and when it did, the noise was noticeably louder than before. I let things run over night, thinking that by the next morning, this new iMac would be as quiet as my old one in normal usage. Photos.app was busy reindexing my library, and Dropbox was working hard to make sure everything in its folder was supposed to be there.
#Imac pro vs imac 27 mac
Even during the migration, I could hear the new iMac's fan blowing, and once I was logged in, it was even louder.Īfter any data migration, a Mac has a lot to do behind the scenes. Unfortunately, it didn't take long to realize that I had made a mistake. I slapped 32GB of OWC RAM in it - for a total of 40GB - and migrated my data from my trusty 2015 model. I decided to take the conservative route, so I ordered the regular iMac. With this iMac, I would still have a noticeably faster machine on my desk, but with a lot more cash in the bank. If I opted for third-party RAM, I could pick up a 4.2GHz i7 iMac with a 1TB SSD for $3,099. The standard iMac Pro is still a lot faster than my 2015 could ever be, but then I started looking at a fully loaded 2017 5K iMac. I knew the $4,999 entry model was the only iMac Pro I could both justify and afford. It seemed like the most well-rounded machine out of the near-countless possibilities that Apple's online configuration tools allow, but at $6,599, it wasn't something I could afford. My initial plan was to pick up a 10-core model with 64GB of RAM, coupled with a 1TB SSD and the entry-level GPU. It didn't take long to realize that I had made a mistake. After I wrote that column, Apple released final pricing details on the iMac Pro, so I sat down with my budget, a spreadsheet, and loaded in my browser. Last month, we left our hero weighing his options, considering replacing his i5 Late 2015 iMac with 5K Retina display with an iMac Pro.
0 kommentar(er)
